In westernizes world / industrialized, there were a lot of lies, misinformation and deliberate confusion of data on the types of fats and oils should get in our diet. In fact, I'll even say that. This is one of the main causes of epidemic diseases; heart disease, stroke, cancer, diabetes, organ failure, mental illness ... We have had over the last 80 years or more, must be the bad fats and oils consumed.
- That, with a lack of fats and oils in food quality.
Now regarded as judge and jury. Let me introduced me. I accuse the establishment of food (and those are definitely in cahoots with) from: lies, deception, disinformation, concealment, junk science and confusion to profiteer. They managed to convince consumers through the years that its food contains all the fat and waste oil are new healthy. But the truth is known; by commercial greed that have done more harm than good.
And ... This is what has been achieved.
Let's go back to about the sass, it was a time when diseases such as heart disease, cancer, diabetes and other epidemic diseases were rare in the westernizes / industrialized world. So it is very possible that begging: What happened to such a heinous increase in these disorders in recent years, about 90? How have they reached epidemic levels? Why, for example, have heart disease now become the cause of more than 40% of deaths in the United States?
During the early years, before a significant increase in epidemics mainly two major things happened that allowed the health of many people suffer accordingly. The pain continued to increase in number in recent years and continues to this day ...
With regard to these two points (two factors), the other effectively promoted. Thus, allowing both to grow and to be accepted by uninformed consumers. That is why I firmly believe that it was not a coincidence that these things have happened that way. Both had been orchestrated to happen that way. They were launched at the right time ... More on that later.
- These two things are:
Consumers were advised by "scientific evidence" found to be low in saturated fat and low cholesterol diet reduce heart disease.
More and more foods in recent years have been made with more unsaturated fat and less saturated fat consumed. A low-fat diet was also considered safer alternative called.
- Both, of course, are always accepted in the current dominant today.
Take the No. 1 factor is it true? A low-fat-sat and low cholesterol diet really helped to less heart disease? What about the supposedly irrefutable scientific proof?
- Let's examine the evidence.
Part of my education, I was led to believe that the significant findings must be supported by strong evidence. In the case of low-fat and low leading to less heart disease, evidence of this, to say the least, is not as convincing cholesterol-sat, it may come as a surprise to many.
Was this the beginning of the genocidal misinformation?
By 1948, a study began. It examined the relationship between saturated fat and cholesterol in humans for about 6,000 5-year intervals. It's called the Birmingham study (conducted in Birmingham, Massachusetts, USA). During the inspection results, by comparing the two groups:
A group with diet / cholesterol high in fat and sitting
The other group with a diet rich in low low cholesterol / fat in Sat
Dry. William Cannel, director of the Birmingham study said in so many words,
"Total plasma cholesterol is a powerful predictor of disease-related death of heart ..."
However, some 40 years later, on closer examination, we find that the above statement was not consistent with actual results. Without fanfare, revealed in an obscure journal, an admission by Dry. William Castillo, director of the successive study sheds some light on the truth of the matter. Basically, he said:
"In Birmingham, Massachusetts, ate the most saturated fat, more cholesterol eat more calories than you eat, the more cholesterol to the person ... We find that people who ate the most cholesterol, ate the most saturated fat, ate the most calories, weigh less and are more physically active "
The study showed that those who weighed more and had abnormally high levels of blood cholesterol were slightly more at risk for future heart disease: but weight gain and cholesterol levels in the blood have was inversely correlated with the consumption of fats and cholesterol in the diet "
- In other words, the Birmingham study has shown that a diet low in cholesterol and low in fat sitting reduces the risk of heart disease. Many other studies have also led to the same conclusion.
Other results, such as the heart surgeon Michael Debased outright disagree with the idea that high cholesterol = heart disease. After examining 17,000 patients, no relationship between cholesterol and cardiovascular problems found ...
A Journal of Nutrition study by a board of medical research that shows that men eating butter (sat fat) were 50% less likely to develop heart disease than margarine (polyunsaturated fatty acids)
The people of North India are known to eat 17 times more saturated fat than South Indians. However, the incidence of coronary heart disease is 7 times lower in northern India ...
However, despite these studies, like many others showing a lack of evidence of the decline sit-fat diet to lower cholesterol as the healthy option, were ignored.
In conclusion
- The politically correct decision to support Sam in low fat diet food / low cholesterol effectively became the ordinary conclusion, the Diet Dictators care and as seen above, is a deception that favors profits over concern for the well -be the people.
